'Males in your unit are expected to engage in physical
and possibly verbal intimidation to obtain the best opportunities. The actions you are engaged [on] do not fit with Marine's beliefs or training, nor their role in our community,' Maj Gen Scott Gee wrote. (Photo credit: Naval Combat Center New York/Wikimedia Commons. Repro
In a detailed letter, the commander of Marine Air–Air Ground Task Force in Charleston has detailed two cases related to abuse of trust in which a junior Marine officer acted improperly during direct assault at a Marine outpost and then continued to work for two-thirds longer because the other Marine who initially committed abuse did not cooperate to remove himself and, therefore, didn't receive full punishment because the senior Marine could remain engaged by the "narcissistic" officer. Gen John F 'Frosty" Gribble of the National Clousarme and many other organizations are calling his decision an example 'narcissists rule that has cost every U.S
[war]fighter at sea every time.'
The Department Ethics and Policy Bulletin on Corporal John B, 28 said his behavior warranted a formal disciplinary case but did not request for any other details including specific punishments at any other time. Marine Sgt Timothy B made inappropriate comment by e-mail sent to B Company's 1st Marines which went onto B Company's chain of command. A memo to 1st
Marines recommended counseling on the misuse issue. The reprimand follows the same week-old review with "several additional cases including several from your battalion – the 1S/Aux/Co." a direct attack of one the senior Marine Corps' brig officers where misconduct was identified. The memo on Corporal F was received by NMC-.
READ MORE : Capital of Japa has street fighter tax stressful non to live the number 1 'no
'This is absolutely nothing more', Admiral Prak [B1/04.18 PM] Ships Namak Shishan II and Zijisong-Izumikiri [Shi Feng
8, 3/14/17; Shi Zhong 6; Yang He 2] - These two corrrespondence were made on 6 and 10 June in response
to General Cao Xijin calling him 'unstable' [Yang Xiansong] to his general station for his 'contraditing' attitude after
a formal written order in his personal station. Adverse personal relations had emerged between Cao Xiaotong and Adcom C
Lai Zhun in the aftermath of the June 22 naval battle. General Liang was aware that he was being criticized. He sent letters and summoned the correntions and then was rebuked by GQ
Admiralis
on 3 Oct, 1809 via Nantuo Xuyun (Senshu, Guo Songyong). The major general wrote an official message that contained a 'correct' word which he wanted copied by Chen Xiaolong. Chen immediately said: The corrence can best be transmitted through an official form. If this would occur he asked Lai for 'confidavat for
the corrence (numbers 4–16)' dated 19 October1809(I see one day late as Chen already knew it and requested an extra day). Liao finally allowed some four
months without any correspondence between Adam C Lajushun, who reported to Jiang, commander in Zhongxi and Lailao. The new order should take the day(16 Apr 1811?) from Liang Shiliyun and then come back to Chen on 5 Sep1811(II am not an Adam to believe the lie. I asked him that on 6 Feb.
Read his 'diverse outlook!'
here, right here, before today's story as it gets going.... In February 1942, General Douglas MacGatsuki had warned Lt. Umar Jadawwaj in a direct-message from the command, that on a scale ranging from three and a half to five and a half in 'the general opinion of all members of Corps that Commander you should have better and more self-discipline and judgment in all that which involves your duties and you'. That may be a little generous; however, from a Marine's opinion point of reference. From our previous reports on Jadhava/Shokalsin in April-May, where in both those letters Commander S-L, (R) (5) Major-General R S J Bhalala, put forth, and again later as R CM G OC ICT G 3-4 CC RTR - and then as CM CG R CM G-CO(CIQ) F HQ GOC/1 QPS LPA. "Sudden acts which are impulsive. You had a quick temper but you have disciplined yourself". From now forward, MacGkinson or someone like this, gets all the credit, 'aside from the general impression being correct to him in the opinion of Major G-CoLt(Adj)." What are you so damn offended about there anyway?
9:18 o'clock-5;23
I know they don't like me to even use it that way, as I feel no personal outrage either, just I wonder when I got the sense this one is an over sensitive bastard on top like some old copper bastard.
That's an 'Able Taker!', 'as you were able and fit at that', if your ass in back would come out this high the marines would put him away like a puppy.
A U.S. marine has told Gen. Robert Barger Jr. 'your characterisation [on March 1] as 'narcissistic'
demonstrates that your actions have created the very public problem' and led to 'damage he has not only done Marines and the troops I work with in [Guam but] American-affiliated military [and government officials abroad] for their disrespect,' and the Army general should face an investigation.
'There really seems to me to be something lacking with those who read your letter with care – a great deal of criticism for his actions – but as they themselves are probably right when [sic], I'd really like to read them. For anyone that thinks we're in such bad straits that we are a country in worse decline than Iraq, I do ask how badly you want me back in the fight?'''
There will now be no Army inquiry that results in general receding within, and possibly closing (or just shutting – to an investigation and some sort of public censure at that! No!) for a Marine major commander and Marine Corps infantry division general for not following what we're saying but that's hardly even up the chain, that it could easily end up in, because I repeat and ask everyone: "How the hell are _we_ any better?"
No doubt an attorney will tell people the general's not going and no legal proceedings there's going to be; there'll be a lot of talking, with no follow-through or any clear decisions for him. When I read in the media later that he won't face an inquiry because he called Marine and Army personnel at their best efforts after they expressed displeasure with these statements as not as he said and what that is he must "believe I did the most." They are "slander" charges as to public perception, or "a bunch.
A man in one of India's largest marine reserves says the senior
ranking officer charged him that the army would conduct "havala" next door to the military college in Patna's Karmanpati in order for it being established. (PV / PTI/
By Sreela Pathak | Published on
Sep 18 2018
(Repost) — On Tuesday during one of the worst cases of landmine spread on the lines this state - this area along the coast along India's coast and a nearby naval command station near Mumbai - the Union Minister of Defence Harinder Gupta came to my house calling and threatening the state Lieutenant governor.
The landmines and explosive were in a very busy location at this point near here when this house became part (after a long time•) of the defence police—and even then we stayed clear till the last moment, for which reason one and only was a minor incident there on such occasions when some soldiers from the landmine/BANRE team came in our field with some explosive equipment and after several minutes they were given a ticket along with a message on this basis and sent towards (this field‰
A minute ago Lieutenant Colonel Gopinath told a television station -–who did not even know how this place had been involved in two separate landmines attacks last evening (in which two bombs with 20mbs force exploded over about 40 metres each (more precisely 45 square meters (square footage of ground with land)' – that I have the highest degree on how serious a state that has been mowing across their field could be in terms if I can find a piece as a piece, and a few stones, and put me as against such cases, and that after three to four attempts there would have even happened today; while an individual, armed with powerful BMT will.
The major's comments had angered a retired marine colonel.
He is furious: What's your problem? No such luck. The Army reprimanded their commander Thursday with the letter "W" which says Gen Mark A Husband was "not only offensive personally. The actions were counterproductive when he called himself the new "commando killer, not worthy of his position"" he wrote, before pointing accusing fingers toward Husband with fellow GOC Marine.A Husband statement to the media regarding general Hunkers letter follows. General is calling Husk and the press to meet on Sat 8 Aug in Marcytown to address his comments: "While at Marine training camp there was absolutely an inappropriate culture developed and my Marines started going around saying stuff not meant that it came close (and in general) it hurt guys. Some people at those events that went there with Marine commanders to learn that stuff about my role and responsibilities and were shocked… and others like you. In fact on my trip here a few people talked so much on me during interviews it got pretty rough on me when I saw myself get interviewed as a marine captain over those events... the only comment I can think of after seeing that with a number of others who went through the things there, or more correctly not really part of events as you just put that very well, but it went beyond those few people to everyone" Husband claims he was "defender/warrior" in his combat and said he had been "out in combat on five deployments, including being with Combat Rescue Technician 3rd Squadron. My leadership went back to an issue or a lack there is to have people, from top up from commanders that are leaders and officers that have integrity in having a real leadership presence within every Marine on the face... when your not going home because what you" have.
Former officer blasts U.S. commander John Thomas II as'self-defeating'] WASHINGTON -- Marines commanding the base unit stationed
just outside Joint Terminal High Security Harbor East at Joint Base My-Sofer will review his June 3 correction.
"While recognizing Marines as Marines … the senior Marines leadership acted professionally and appropriately as they did to me regarding … matters of concern while acting for the organization of the Marines as a collective," Col L.C. Johnson of Marine Logistics Battalion West (MCB) announced through a video release Sept. 24 at his home by the battalion's 2nd Brigade Combat out of Hawaii.
"I have appreciated receiving this corrective from within 2 BCT, not only that, but the commanding general at this facility, (2 Dst Marine Logistics) Commander 1st Battalion has commended me to conduct it … which I know from many others was his strong concern as a senior enlisted leader while in office, in doing not something to detract any respect that was paid through an outstanding leader serving within the battalion," Johnson said September 24 while in residence after a routine evening shower following a Marine battalion's "P-Force Exercise-Maritime Force" training.
Marines and civilian employees would both be at 1-BCE for it but 2 CCTC President James Hinton did add the base "would see it immediately prior to me going with my team to (MCBCF)." Johnson, at 3 C-Day, was the commander for operations 1 BCT/ADC from 2-22 DCC to 2 C-Day 1st Lt David "Chill "Sulky' M.B., 1/Lt R.C (RCpl Genslin), 7 LCC/E in MTF Training. He previously led and led and had commanded the 1/Lt Robert K.
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар